« back to Onnik Krikorian in Armenia home

 

Demonstration outside Georgian Embassy

| 6

DSC_0009.jpg
 
 
To be honest, I hadn’t particularly planned on attending today’s demonstration staged outside the Georgian Embassy in Yerevan to protest the detention of two ethnic Armenian activists in Georgia’s Samtskhe Javakheti region – or rather, I was in two minds about doing so. To begin with, a friend in town from Tbilisi told me on Saturday that the region could hardly be considered a hotbed of separatist nationalism seeking autonomy or unification with Armenia, a sentiment also shared by a foreign journalist based in the Georgian capital. 
 
True, socio-economic conditions aren't particularly good either, but that’s pretty much the case for most ethnic Georgian or Azerbaijani-populated regions in the country as well as pretty much anywhere outside the center of Yerevan, the Armenian capital. Nevertheless, after a phone call from one of those publicizing various other protests staged outside the Embassy informing me that the demonstration had been rescheduled for three hours later than originally planned, I jumped in a taxi and headed downtown.
 
Perhaps the main reason for going was to see how many people turned up. My taxi driver, for example, had heard about the protest on Radio Free Europe’s broadcast the day before and guessed why I was heading there. However, he seemed quite concerned that blockaded by Turkey and Azerbaijan, problems between Yerevan and Tbilisi would be the end of Armenia. With over 70 percent of the country's trade going through Georgia, and still at war with Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh, he had a point.
 
DSC_0032.jpg
 
As it was, about 100 people turned up, a third of which were reporters -- an unnaturally high level of media interest for a demonstration which could hardly attract more than 70 people mainly from Samtskhe-Javakheti, a region populated by a little over 100,000 ethnic Armenians (54 percent of its total population). What was also notable was that while some did hold up plackards of the two detained activists charged with espionage, most seemed more interested in screaming out "Javakhk," the Armenian name for the region. 
 
Staging the demonstration in Yerevan also raises a few questions as to why it wasn't held in Tbilisi. Some argue that it could be for internal political consumption a few days before the first anniversary of the 1 March post-election clashes in the Armenian capital during which 10 people died, or to whip up emotions among the population which would indirectly lead to the rejection of any normalization of ties with Turkey and a possible future settlement of the Karabakh conflict. It could also directly lead to increased support for Russia, already accused of stirring up trouble in Georgia.
 
DSC_0018.jpg
 
Regardless, the Ambassador, Revaz Gachechiladze, wasn’t at the Embassy because of a high profile visit by Georgian parliamentary speaker David Bakradze, but would be back in 20 minutes. The main organizers of the protest – local Republican Party MP Shirak Torosyan, President of the Javakhk Youth Union Artyush Grigoryan and Eduard Abrahamyan, head of a youth “analytical center” with strong nationalist overtones -- declined to wait inside and instead gave interviews to the mob of tv crews and reporters covering an otherwise less than noteworthy demonstration. 
 
 DSC_0077.jpg
 
The police moved in to clear the way when Gachechiladze arrived and the protest organizers entered the Embassy to voice their demands, handing over a letter in Armenian which the Embassy promises to pass on to the authorities in Tbilisi once translated into Georgian. Typically for any demonstration in Armenia, they promised to fight until the end, but judging from the chants and the lack of any slogans calling for the release of the detained activists, it’s seems more likely that their main hope was to whip up anti-Georgian sentiments among the public. 
 
But, while the rights of minorities in all three South Caucasus countries should always remain in the focus of international organizations charged with the task of supporting democratization and human rights protection in the region, it didn’t look as though they succeeded, although they did attract the attention of the local media who are not known for covering opposition rallies with such enthusiasm. Perhaps it was a slow news day... 
 
Photos: Georgian Embassy protest, Yerevan, Republic of Armenia © Onnik Krikorian / Oneworld Multimedia 2009

6 Comments

user-pic
Onnik Krikorian | February 25, 2009 7:39 PM | Reply

Interestingly, just came back from my local kiosk where they have a television perched up high to pass the time in between customers and Mitq was live on air talking about Samtskhe-Javakheti. Of course, there was no Georgian representative present to engage in actual discussion and debate or even to counter any claims made.

Meanwhile, one has to wonder whether the local media reported sufficiently enough on the release today of a report by Human Rights Watch which accuses the Armenian police of the disproportionate use of force in the post-election clash with opposition supporters almost a year ago to the day during which 10 people died.

http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2009/02/25/democracy-rocky-ground-0

There will be something on Frontline about the report later, but for now, suffice to say that those online media outlets I've just checked which have been most prolific in constantly pushing nationalist perspectives on Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey this week have failed to mention the HRW report. Perhaps it escaped their notice.

user-pic
Onnik Krikorian | February 25, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply

Well, thanks to a sub-standard Internet connection from the appallingly bad Beeline ISP in Armenia looks like I've lost my post on the HRW 1 March report. Been searching on the Internet to find out how to retrieve what might have been auto-saved but can'tr find anything. So, unless anyone has some suggestions, just read the report on the 1 March 2008 post-election violence in Armenia at the link given above.

user-pic
Llywelyn | February 26, 2009 5:15 AM | Reply

Interesting that the demonstration's organizers didn't bother to translate their letter into Georgian first before handing it over to the embassy. They just gave the embassy a potentially good reason for it not going any further -- "technical reasons." Guess it's a reflection of the age-old cultural tug-of-war between both sides?

user-pic
Onnik Krikorian | February 27, 2009 2:14 PM | Reply

Baku-based Regional Analyst Paul Goble has this to say on Samtskhe-Javakheti, the sudden and disproportionate coverage in the Armenian media, and suspicions that Russia is behind stirring up trouble in the region.

WindowonEurasia: Window on Eurasia: Moscow’s Program to Dismember Georgia

[...] perhaps most important at the present time, it calls attention to Moscow’s ongoing efforts to exacerbate tensions in the Armenian-populated portion of southern Georgia, Samtskhe-Javakhetia, and put that region in play against Tbilisi in much the same way it sought to exploit Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

[...]

On the one, Georgian officials point out, the situation in Samtskhe-Javekhetia is relatively calm, the result they suggest of the arrest of two extremists that has sparked so much controversy and of Tbilisi’s support for new roads and Armenian-language schools there. Indeed, the “language” problem in that region is for ethnic Georgians there who have only one school.

And on the other, they point to the fact that it has been the ethnic Armenian Javakhetian diaspora in Moscow that has taken the lead in trying to attract attention to that region’s “aspirations.” Last week, for example, this diaspora released an open letter calling on Armenia, Russia, and Georgians (as opposed to the Georgian government) to help them.

[...]

But even though both the ombudsman for the Georgian government and human rights activists who have visited Samtskhe-Javakhetia in recent weeks say that the situation there is normal and calm, more stories to the contrary are likely to appear not only in Armenia where attention to this area might seem entirely natural but also in Moscow where it clearly is not.

And such articles, appeals, and demonstrations outside of Samtskhe-Javakhetia on behalf of that region are, according to Tbilisi’s Bayburt, clear evidence that “Russia is doing everything it can to provoke the rise of separatism in Georgia and in particular in [that] region where Armenians live in a compact group.”

http://windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2009/02/window-on-eurasia-moscows-program-to.html

user-pic
nazarian | February 27, 2009 4:02 PM | Reply

Looks like there are more journalists covering the event than the actual participants. Must have been a slow news day.

user-pic
Onnik Krikorian | February 27, 2009 4:36 PM | Reply

Nazarian, there were about 70 protesters behind the journalists interspersed between construction trucks doing whatever they're doing on that street. But yes, the number of journalists as a percentage for such a low profile event was very noticeable indeed. On the subject of the media, to be honest, I just don't think the TV especially is covering the type of subjects it should be and I'm sure the presence of an MP from the ruling Republican Party had something to do with it.

Timing with the HRW/US State Department reports might have been coincidental, but for sure the demo managed to keep those from sufficient or any coverage in many media outlets. Foreign policy issues seem to serve such purposes in deflecting attention from internal political problems worldwide, but especially in this region. Anyway, for sure there are issues facing minorities in the region, and especially Georgia, but most seem to frame these types of activities in another context.

Interestingly, however, there weren't any Dashnaks in sight.

What do you think?